當(dāng)前位置: 網(wǎng)校排名> 新東方在線> 考研閱讀精選:我們緣何剝奪孩子們的睡眠?
新東方在線 考研培訓(xùn)

考研

發(fā)布時(shí)間: 2016年08月19日

考研閱讀精選:我們緣何剝奪孩子們的睡眠?

新東方考研精品課0元免費(fèi)學(xué)
『盡管有許多的科學(xué)研究表明,增加孩子們的睡眠時(shí)間有助于他們大腦的發(fā)育,但調(diào)整孩子們作息的行動(dòng)卻遲遲未執(zhí)行。這背后有何難言之隱?長此以往又會(huì)對(duì)孩子們?cè)斐珊畏N影響?怎樣才能緩解這其中的種種影響?』

Why Are We Depriving Our Teens of Sleep?

我們緣何剝奪孩子們的睡眠?


Nov 18th, 2011 | from Time
\

Daylight is at a premium these days, and if your family is anything like ours, your teenagers are having a hard time getting out of bed in the morning. “Delayed sleep phase” is what affects them: the maddening shift in circadian rhythms that causes adolescents to fall asleep and awake at ever-later hours. Adolescents need an average of 9.25 hours of sleep per night to support their developing brains, which are exploding at a rate akin to infancy. But we treat access to sleep as if it were an illegal drug, commonly requiring teens to start school at 7:00 a.m. or earlier.
This puts students at a serious disadvantage. Numerous studies show that later start times are associated with lower rates of obesity, fewer car accidents and lower drop-out rates, as well as improved academic performance. In one study, shifting the start time from 7:20 to 8:40 a.m. significantly reduced depression as well. A few districts have shifted start times successfully, so why hasn’t the practice been adopted more widely despite overwhelming scientific evidence?
There are all sort of logistical excuses: delaying start times means parents might not be able to get to work as early; bus schedules would have to be shifted; a later school day would interfere with sports games and practices; teenagers would get home from school later, which would reduce family time.
But our inability to change start times is also illustrative of a larger pattern of neglecting the wellbeing and potential of our young people. We know, for example, that playtime and music increase cognitive development; yet school systems nationwide have dramatically slashed budgets for those critical activities. We know that children are sickened by junk food; yet we peddle unhealthy snacks in school cafeterias — and Congress just voted down proposed changes to the school lunch program that would require including fruits and green vegetables. We know that American teachers are poorly paid and supervised compared to teachers in many other countries; yet teacher-blaming is a favorite pastime.
On the sleep issue, like so many things related to children, adults often assume that there are impossible tradeoffs: if we “coddle” students by giving them adequate sleep, they might lose their competitive edge. Perhaps this is why, when an online petition was recently launched on the White House website requesting federal action to delay start times for teenagers, it didn’t meet the threshold of 5,000 signatures to merit an official response.
Making the switch would require collective action: we’d all have to make the switch together. Until the late 1960’s, the people of Sweden all drove on the left side of the road, like they do in England today. Then, one day, overnight, all the road signs in Sweden were changed, and everyone — together — started driving on the right side of the road. There were very few accidents and many benefits. Any major change in the social status quo is hard, but it is not impossible, and it often needs to be dramatic. (497 words)

熱門推薦:

考研網(wǎng)校哪個(gè)好
新東方考研培訓(xùn)班
考研培訓(xùn)班
考研培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu)哪個(gè)好
考研英語網(wǎng)絡(luò)課程
文都考研網(wǎng)校
北京考研培訓(xùn)班

歷年考研真題下載

×